Weighting of Valence, Volume, and Credibility by Consumers of High Risk Products: A Study of One Detailed Negative Review versus Ten Positive Reviews

Authors

  • Yusuf Rahman Al Hakim Al-Hakim University of Mayjen Sungkono Mojokerto Author

Keywords:

negative review, consumer decision, electronic word of mouth, perceived risk, source credibility

Abstract

Consumers frequently encounter one detailed negative review alongside ten positive reviews when evaluating high risk products. This study synthesizes existing literature to explain how consumers weigh valence, volume, and credibility under such asymmetric conditions. Findings indicate that a single negative review consistently overpowers ten positive reviews due to negativity bias, emotional contagion, source credibility effects, and non compensatory decision strategies. Product categories with high perceived risk such as skincare and electronics amplify this asymmetry. The review's specificity, recency, and the seller's response quality moderate the effect. Volume of positive reviews offers limited protection because consumers process information narratively rather than mathematically. These results challenge the assumption that accumulating positive reviews effectively counteracts negative information. The study provides a theoretical framework for understanding information weighting in electronic word of mouth and offers practical guidance for reputation management in high risk product markets.

References

Al Hakim, Y. R., Irfan, M., & Arifin, S. 2020. Corporate Social Responsibility Sebagai Instrumen Pemasaran: Pembentukan Citra Merek dan Kepercayaan Konsumen. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 10(2), 51-64.

Amin, M. N., Herisasono, A., Mujito, Khayru, R. K., & Zakki, M. 2023. Legal Protection of Consumers in Online Transactions for Counterfeit Halal Products on E-Commerce Platforms. Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(1), 53-58.

Arifin, S, Y. R. Al Hakim, D. Darmawan, M. Irfan, & D. S. Sigita. 2021. Technical and Ethical Dimensions of Search Engine Optimization in Managing Online Business Visibility, Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1(1), 193-208.

Camilleri, A. R. 2020. The Importance Of Online Reviews Depends On When They Are Presented. 133, 113307.

Chen, H., Duan, W., & Zhou, W. 2021. When Products Receive Reviews Across Platforms: Studying The Platform Concentration Of Electronic Word-Of-Mouth. Information & Management, 58(8), 103532.

Choudhury, M., & Srinivasan, K. 2019. An Overview Into The Aspects Of Fake Product Reviews, Its Manipulation, And Its Effects And Monitoring. 1–2.

Craciun, G., & Moore, K. 2019. Credibility Of Negative Online Product Reviews: Reviewer Gender, Reputation And Emotion Effects. Computers In Human Behavior, 97, 104–115

Crowther, D., & Lancaster, G. 2012. Research Methods (2nd Ed.). Routledge.

Da Silva, E. B., Darmawan, D., & Irfan, M. 2022. Understanding Social Contracts: Formal Agreements in Business Practice. Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 2(1), 127-144.

Darmawan, D. 2021. Social Interaction in Digital Society: Changes in Online Communication Patterns and Dynamics of Virtual Communities, Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1(1), 325-350.

Darmawan, D. 2022. Literature review on antecedents of customer switching behavior. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1(3), 1-5.

Darmawan, D. 2023. Pengaruh promosi, ulasan produk, dan persepsi harga terhadap pemilihan toko online. Jurnal Industri Kreatif dan Kewirausahaan, 6(1), 95-105.

Darmawan, D. 2023. Studi empiris perilaku konsumen Aliexpress: Peran online consumer review, online customer rating, dan persepsi harga terhadap keputusan pembelian impulsif. Jurnal Baruna Horizon, 6(1), 1-13.

Ermel, A. P. C., Lacerda, D. P., Morandi, M. I. W. M., & Gauss, L. (2021). Literature Grounded Theory (LGT). 85–146.

Essa, N. E., & Mardikaningsih, R. 2021. Sustainability Communication through Green Marketing: Strengthening Consumer Awareness and Corporate Environmental Integrity. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(2), 233-238.

Essa, N. E., & Mardikaningsih, R. 2023. The Strategic Role of Human Resource Management in Building Competencies and Bridging the Skills Gap Towards a Green Economy. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 4(3), 36-40.

Fared, M. A. & D. Darmawan. 2021. Use of Consumer Behaviour Data for Personalised Advertising in Digital Marketing, Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1(2), 93-108.

Filieri, R., Raguseo, E., & Vitari, C. 2019) What Moderates The Influence Of Extremely Negative Ratings? The Role Of Review And Reviewer Characteristics. International Journal Of Hospitality Management, 77, 333–341.

Hardyansah, R., R. Saputra, D. Darmawan, & D. S. Negara. 2022. Public Legal Consciousness Regarding Online Credit Agreements from Civil Law and Consumer Protection Perspectives, Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 2(1), 261-282.

Hirschmeier, S., & Tilly, R. 2020. Consumers’ Need For Negative Product Information Before Reading Reviews. 1–10

Ifie, K. 2020. Excellent Product … But Too Early To Say: Consumer Reactions To Tentative Product Reviews. Journal Of Interactive Marketing, 52, 35–51.

Infante, A., & Mardikaningsih, R. 2022. The Potential of Social Media as a Means of Online Business Promotion. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 45-49.

Işçi, Ü., & Kitapçi, H. 2020. Responses Of Turkish Consumers To Product Risk Information In The Context Of Negative Ewom. Journal Of Business Economics And Management, 21(6), 1593–1609.

Jahroni, J., & Darmawan, D. 2018. Interaksi Pasar Barang dan Pasar Uang serta Implikasi Kebijakan Makroekonomi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 8(2), 31–42.

Kumar, N. D. 2023. Managing Negative Product Reviews: Strategies And Research Findings. 93–114.

Kurniawan, Y, D. Darmawan, & R. K. Khayru. 2021. Social Media and Contemporary Youth Digital Literature, Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1(2), 109-124.

Laer, T. Van. 2020. It’s The Story, Stupid: The Consumer Reviews Most Likely To Influence Purchasing Decisions. 12(2), 46–51

Lancaster, G., & Crowther, D. 2012. Research Methods: A Concise Introduction To Research In Management And Business Consultancy. Routledge.

Leske, J. S. 1990. Evaluating Sources For Secondary Analysis. Heart & Lung, 19, 537–539.

Lestari, U. P., & Mardikaningsih, R. 2012. Peran Jaringan Sosial untuk Membantu Mendapatkan Akses Pasar. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2(2), 73–83.

Li, W., Dan, Q., Chi, M., & Wang, W. 2021. Influence Of Price Level And Perceived Price Dispersion On Consumer Information Search Behaviour: Moderating Effect Of Durables And Consumables. Sustainability, 13(4), 2105.

Luan, J., Shan, W., Shan, W., Wang, Y., & Xiao, J. 2019. How Easy-To-Process Information Influences Consumers Over Time: Online Review Vs. Brand Popularity. Computers In Human Behavior, 97, 193–201.

Ma, Q. 2023. Introduction: Managing Product Reviews. Iii–V.

Mardikaningsih, R, S. N. Halizah, R. Nuraini, & D. Darmawan. 2021. Clashes Between Local Values and Green Marketing Approaches in Traditional Communities, Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1(2), 157-172.

Mardikaningsih, R., & Darmawan, D. 2021. Business Sustainability Strategies in the Facing of Regulatory Uncertainty and Managerial Challenges. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(2), 111-118.

Mardikaningsih, R., Mahardani, U. K., Aisyah, S., Darmawan, D., & Handoko, F. D. 2024. The Influence of Blockchain Technology on Eco-Friendly Product Supply Chain Transparency and Consumer Trust. Journal of Engineering and Social Science, 4(2).

Melamed, D., Savage, S. V., & Munn, C. 2019. Uncertainty And Social Influence. 5(4), 237802311986697.

Melendez-Torres, G. J., Thomas, J., Richardson, M., Felix, L., Lorenc, T., Thomas, S., & Petticrew, M. 2015. Lessons From Comparing Narrative Synthesis And Meta-Analysis In A Systematic Review. The Lancet, 386, 9.

Naujoks, A., & Benkenstein, M. 2020. Expert Cues: How Expert Reviewers Are Perceived Online. Journal Of Service Theory And Practice, 30, 531–556.

Negara, D. S., Darmawan, D., & Gardi, B. 2021. The Approach of Consumer Reviews to Product Competitiveness and Management Strategies. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(2), 149-154.

Negara, D. S., Darmawan, D., & Saktiawan, P. 2022. Privacy Violations on Social Media and Interpersonal Trust Among Young Generations. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 151-156.

Radjawane, L. E., & Mardikaningsih, R. 2022. Building Ethical and Fair Technology: Approaches to Responsible Technology Development and Application. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(1), 189-194.

Ramle, N. L. B., & Mardikaningsih, R. 2022. Inclusivity in Technology-Based Services: Access and Skills Challenges. Journal of Social Science Studies, 2(2), 225-230.

Ren, G., & Hong, T. 2019. Examining The Relationship Between Specific Negative Emotions And The Perceived Helpfulness Of Online Reviews. Information Processing And Management, 56(4), 1425–1438.

Sharma, K. P. 2023. Writing A Literature Review In Reseach. Deleted Journal, 2(1), 34–44.

Shihab, M. R., & Putri, A. P. 2019. Negative Online Reviews Of Popular Products: Understanding The Effects Of Review Proportion And Quality On Consumers’ Attitude And Intention To Buy. Electronic Commerce Research, 19(1), 159–187.

Sinambela, E. A. & D. Darmawan. 2021. Relevance of Email Marketing in the Contemporary Digital Marketing Communication Mix, Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1(2), 301-324.

Sinambela, E. A., & Aprilianti, E. T. 2011. Strategi mengatasi erosi loyalitas pelanggan di tengah intensitas persaingan pasar. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 1(2), 76-89.

Sinambela, E. A., & Aprilianti, E. T. 2012. Proses Pengembangan Produk dan Peningkatan Kualitas Sesuai Kebutuhan Pasar. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 2(2), 26–37.

Sinambela, E. A., & Halizah, S. N. 2023. Social Stratification and Lifestyle in Consumer Society: Status Expression Through Consumption and Taste Formation. Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 3(1), 367-392.

Sinambela, E. A., D. Nurmalasari, D. Darmawan, & R. Mardikaningsih. 2021. The Role of Business Capital, Level of Education, and Technology in Increasing Business Income. Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1(1), 77–92.

Sinambela, E. A., Darmawan, D, & Mardikaningsih, R. 2012. Mekanisme psikologis keputusan konsumen berdasarkan prospek teori. S, 2(1), 40–52.

Stevens, J. L., Esmark Jones, C. L., & Breazeale, M. 2022. Title Redacted: The Impact Of Negative Online Review Censorship. Journal Of Product & Brand Management, 31(4), 570-585.

Varga, M., & Albuquerque, P. 2019. Measuring The Impact Of A Single Negative Customer Review On Online Search And Purchase Decisions. Social Science Research Network 1-5.

Wang, Y., Zhong, K., & Liu, Q. 2022. Let Criticism Take Precedence: Effect Of Side Order On Consumer Attitudes Toward A Two-Sided Online Review. Journal Of Business Research, 140, 403-419.

Published

2024-12-29

How to Cite

Al-Hakim, Y. R. A. H. (2024). Weighting of Valence, Volume, and Credibility by Consumers of High Risk Products: A Study of One Detailed Negative Review versus Ten Positive Reviews. Studi Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 4(2), 403-428. https://sisijournals.id/index.php/sisi/article/view/168